Why We Start With an Interview (And Never a Brief Form)

If you’ve ever hired a marketing agency, you’ve probably met the brief form. Ten or twelve questions about your target audience, your key messages, your preferred tone of voice. You fill it in between client meetings, send it back, and wait to see what the writers come up with.

What comes back is usually fine. On brand, grammatically tidy, broadly accurate. It’s also interchangeable with what your competitors are publishing, because their agencies use brief forms too.

Content Play works from a different starting point. Every engagement begins with a recorded conversation, and every batch of content after that starts with one as well. No forms, no written briefs, no homework. This article explains why we’re stubborn about that, and it opens a series on how our whole production system works, from the first conversation to the last scheduled post.

Forms capture answers. Conversations capture thinking.

A brief form asks you to summarise your expertise in advance, in writing, in whatever half hour you can spare. That’s exactly the wrong way to get at the good stuff. The most valuable things you know don’t live in summary form. They live in the way you answer a client’s question on the spot, the story you tell to explain why a popular approach backfires, the opinion you’ve formed over twenty years that half your industry would argue with.

Ask an expert to write down three key messages and you get positioning language. Ask the same expert what a client got badly wrong last month and you get something worth publishing.

The standard agency model makes this worse rather than better. A writer who isn’t a domain expert takes a quick look at your website, makes an educated guess at what you’d probably say, and produces content that could belong to anyone in your field. That’s not laziness. They simply never had access to the expertise. The deep conversation that quality content requires never happened, so the content stays shallow.

What the interview looks like instead

Once every month or two, we sit down with you for 30 to 45 minutes. The conversation is recorded, and there is nothing to prepare. We ask about what you’re seeing in the market, what problems clients are bringing you right now, which questions you answer more than once, and what you’ve changed your mind about lately. We do the asking. You do the talking.

The expertise is always already there. Our job is knowing how to find it. I’ve written a full walkthrough of the session in What Happens in a Content Interview (And Why 45 Minutes Produces Months of Material).

Your interview is the only source

This is the part worth underlining. We don’t research the internet, watch what others in your industry are posting, and recycle it back with your logo on it. Everything we produce comes from your expertise, your ideas, and your advice, captured in that conversation.

That’s what makes the content impossible to copy. A competitor can imitate your topics. They can’t imitate the client stories, the judgement calls, and the hard-won opinions that came out of your interview, because they haven’t lived them.

From one conversation to a full production run

A single interview typically produces months of content: long-form LinkedIn posts, short punchy ones, carousels, infographics, quote cards, and blog articles. The mix is deliberate. The managing partner who reads a 900-word article and the founder who saves a carousel are different prospects at different points in their education, and each format reaches readers the others miss.

If you want to see how a recording becomes a publishing schedule, the whole pipeline is laid out in From Interview to Published Post: The Production Workflow, Step by Step.

Tuning first, then our review

The first few weeks of an engagement are a tuning phase. We produce, you tell us what’s right and what’s off, and we adjust until the content sounds like you on your best day. Anything you’ve already written, emails, proposals, old posts, speeds this up. The detail is in The Tuning Phase: How Content Ends Up Sounding Like You.

From then on, our editors review everything before it goes out. You don’t approve posts, and you don’t check drafts. Have the conversation, get back to your business, and the content appears. If you spot something after publication you’d like adjusted, tell us and we’ll fold it into the next batch. What that hands-off arrangement looks like in practice is covered in Set and Forget: Why You Stop Thinking About Content After the Tuning Phase.

The quality bar never moves: if you wouldn’t say it in a client meeting, it doesn’t go out.

Why the system is built for repetition, not fireworks

Hiring an expert is a big decision, and buyers make it on their own timetable. That can be weeks away or years away. The audience you build through consistently useful content is worth far more than one post that briefly does well, because your audience is still there on the day a buyer is finally ready. I’ve unpacked that argument, and what it means for your standards, in Why Consistency Matters More Than Brilliance (And What That Means for Your Standards).

A brief form can’t sustain that kind of consistency, because it puts the writing burden back on you every single round. A conversation can. Talking about your own work for 45 minutes is the one content task that doesn’t compete with your client work, and it happens to be the task that produces the best raw material.

Where the series goes from here

That’s the case for the interview. The rest of this series covers each stage of the system in more depth: the interview itself, the tuning phase, the production workflow, the hands-off arrangement that follows, and the thinking behind the cadence. Together they describe a system with one design goal: you talk about what you know, and everything else happens without you.

← Back to the blog